Gut Microbiota and Symptom Expression and Severity in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Problem: Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affecting neonates with fetal exposure to opioids, is defined by expression and severity of symptoms. The pathophysiology behind symptoms variability is lacking. The study aims were to examine (a) differences in gut microbiota of neonates with and without NAS, (b) the relationships between gut microbiota and symptom expression and NAS severity, and (c) the changes in the neonate gut microbiota diversity during the course of NAS treatment. Methods: A cross-sectional observational design was used to examine differences in microbiota and a longitudinal, repeated measures approach was used to determine relationships between gut microbiota and NAS symptoms. Symptom data were collected using the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool and the Neonatal Pain Agitation and Sedation Scale. Stool samples were collected for microbiome analyses with 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Results: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS were seen. Relative abundance results revealed 18 taxa were different in neonates with NAS compared to neonates without NAS. No differences were found in alpha or beta diversity in neonates with NAS between enrollment and hospital discharge. There was increased abundance of Escherichia-Shigella and Bacteriodes genera related to higher symptom scores. Discussion: Differences in alpha and beta diversity between neonates with and without NAS may be due to differences in birth mode and type of feeding. The findings of specific increased bacteria related to increased symptoms in the neonates with NAS may also be influenced by birth mode and type of feeding.

PhD student perspectives on maintaining and formalizing peer mentorship during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mentorship is important for doctoral education and development. Students in Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Nursing programs traditionally receive formal mentorship from more experienced faculty mentors, creating a top-down, mentor-mentee relationship. Peer mentorship, characterized by a mentor-mentee relationship between peers in similar career stages, provides unique opportunities for career development and socialization. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic limited in-person interactions and introduced new, complex challenges to peer mentorship. The authors, current and recently graduated PhD in Nursing students, were forced to create new ways of connecting with peers and sought to explore how other PhD in Nursing students experienced and maintained peer mentorship in their respective programs during the pandemic. In this article, the authors share their personal experiences with peer mentorship during the pandemic, their process of creating a formal peer mentor model, and findings from a national, cross-sectional survey on COVID-related, peer mentorship experiences among PhD in Nursing students from other academic institutions. Most respondents were able to maintain peer mentorship throughout the pandemic, however, less than half reported receiving faculty support to do so. Recommendations for PhD in Nursing program administrators are provided, based on the experiences of the authors and survey results from PhD in Nursing students across the United States.

Conducting Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Research During a Pandemic: Challenges and Lessons Learned.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic disrupted normal clinical operations and research. Nurse scientists conducting research studies in the neonatal intensive care unit experienced significant challenges to continuing their research studies amid national lockdowns and hospital visitation restrictions. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to describe the challenges encountered by nurse scientists conducting research studies in the neonatal intensive care unit during the pandemic, the creative solutions devised to overcome these barriers, and the lessons learned during this unprecedented time. METHODS: Using our pandemic area studies as exemplars, we highlight the barriers encountered in continuing our research in the intense environment of the neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS: Visitor restrictions limited the presence of parents and researchers in the neonatal intensive care unit during the pandemic, causing disruptions to participant recruitment and data collection. Laboratory closures further limited research activities during the pandemic. Strategies to overcome these barriers include building formal collaborations among researchers and clinicians, creating the infrastructure to support virtual recruitment and electronic consent, and developing contingency plans for studies involving the analysis of biological samples. DISCUSSION: The neonatal intensive care unit is a unique environment because of vulnerable patient population and need for researchers to interact with parents to recruit study participants. Implementing the strategies developed during the coronavirus pandemic may allow for the continuation of research activities during future public health crises.

Effect of Tactile Experience During Preterm Infant Feeding on Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although the survival rate of very preterm infants has improved, rates of subsequent neurobehavioral disabilities remain high. One factor implicated in poor neurobehavioral and developmental outcomes is hospitalization and inconsistent caregiving patterns in the neonatal intensive care unit. Although much underlying brain damage occurs in utero or shortly after birth, neuroprotective strategies may stop progression of damage, particularly when these strategies are used during the most sensitive periods of neural plasticity 2-3 months before term age. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to test the effect of a patterned feeding experience involving a tactile component (touch and/or holding) provided during feedings on preterm infants' clinical outcomes, measured by oral feeding progress, as an early indicator of neurodevelopment. METHODS: We used an experimental, longitudinal, two-group random assignment design. Preterm infants (n = 120) were enrolled within the first week of life and randomized to an experimental group receiving a patterned feeding experience or to a control group receiving usual feeding care. RESULTS: Analysis of data from 91 infants showed that infants receiving touch at more than 25% of early gavage feedings achieved full oral feeding more quickly; as touch exposure increased, time from first oral to full oral feeding decreased. There was no association between holding during early gavage feedings or touch during transition feedings and time to full oral feeding. DISCUSSION: Neurological expectation during critical periods of development is important for infants. However, a preterm infant's environment is not predictable: Caregivers change regularly, medical procedures dictate touch and holding, and care provision based on infant cues is limited. Current knowledge supports caregiving that occurs with a naturally occurring sensation (i.e., hunger), is provided in a manner that is congruent with the expectation of the neurological system, and occurs with enough regularity to enhance neuronal and synaptic development. In this study, we modeled an experience infants would "expect" if they were not in the neonatal intensive care unit and demonstrated a shorter time from first oral feeding to full oral feeding, an important clinical outcome with neurodevelopmental implications. We recommend further research to determine the effect of patterned caregiving experiences on other areas of neurodevelopment, particularly those that may occur later in life.

Integrative Review of Gut Microbiota and Expression of Symptoms Associated With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal exposure and subsequent withdrawal from maternal substance use disorder are a growing problem and consequence of the current opioid epidemic. Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is defined by a specified cluster of symptoms with treatment guided by the expression and severity of these symptoms. The mechanisms or pathophysiology contributing to the development of NAS symptoms are not well known, but one factor that may influence NAS symptoms is the gut microbiota. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this integrative review was to examine evidence that might show if and how the gut microbiota influence expression and severity of symptoms similar to those seen in NAS. METHODS: Using published guidelines, a review of research studies that focused on the gut microbiome and symptoms similar to those seen in NAS was conducted, using the Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus databases, from 2009 through 2019. RESULTS: The review results included findings of aberrant microbial diversity, differences in microbial communities between study groups, and associations between specific taxa and symptoms. In studies involving interventions, there were reports of improved microbial diversity, community structure, and symptoms. DISCUSSION: The review findings provide evidence that the gut microbiota may play a role in modifying variability in the expression and severity of symptoms associated with NAS. Future research should focus on examining the gut microbiota in infants with and without the syndrome as well as exploring the relationship between symptom expression and aberrant gut microbiota colonization in infants with NAS.

Behavioral Observation of Infants With Life-Threatening or Life-Limiting Illness in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit experience aversive stimuli that cause pain and distress. Maintaining adequate relief from pain and distress is challenging because of infants' varying ages and stages of development and their nonverbal status. Thus, pain and distress must be interpreted by a healthcare provider or other proxy from their own observations or perceptions. There is no standard research or clinical measure for pain and distress in infants. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the use of the COMFORT Behavior (COMFORT-B) Scale as a measure of pain and distress in infants diagnosed with life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses in the neonatal intensive care unit in comparison with the nurse-documented Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; the infants' Technology Dependence Scale; and the mothers' report of total perceived symptom scores. METHODS: Infants diagnosed with life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses and hospitalized in a Level IV neonatal intensive care unit in the Midwestern United States and their parents were included. Measurement of pain and distress in infants was collected weekly from enrollment through 12 weeks or until discharge, whichever occurred first. Observations for the COMFORT-B Scale were conducted before and after standard caregiving activities. Pearson r correlations were used to compare means between pain and distress, technology dependence, and mothers' total perceived symptom scores over time. RESULTS: Data from 78 infants (46 male and 32 female infants) of ages 23-41 weeks of gestation at birth were analyzed. No correlations were found among the COMFORT-B Scale; the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; and mothers' total perceived symptom scores. Moderate correlations were found among the Technology Dependence Scale; mothers' total perceived symptom scores; and the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale. DISCUSSION: Performing COMFORT-B observations can be challenging, and it is unclear whether the information obtained from the COMFORT-B Scale added to the assessment of the infant's pain and distress that is typically recorded in the health record or from parents. Further evaluation is needed to determine if it is more reliable to collect the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale scores rather than conduct observations using the COMFORT-B Scale in studies of infants with life-threatening and life-limiting illnesses in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Nursing Across the Lifespan: Implications of Lifecourse Theory for Nursing Research.

Despite the lifecourse focus of nursing clinical care, nursing research largely remains cross-sectional or process-oriented within silos determined by patient characteristics such as age, acuity, or disease process. Incorporating interdisciplinary lifecourse theory into pediatric nursing research provides the opportunity to expand nursing theories and research beyond practice, age, and disease silos. One such theory is the Lifecourse Health Development (LCHD) framework. LCHD takes a more expansive view of health development from preconception through old age based on the premise that health is a consequence of transactions between genetic, biological, behavioral, social, and economic contexts that change as a child develops over time (Halfon & Hochstein, 2002). LCHD also explains how intergenerational influences and prevention during early life help predict health development and disease over the lifespan. The preventive and lifecourse focus of LCHD is well-aligned with the lifespan wellness foci of pediatric nurses. The purpose of this article is to introduce pediatric nurse researchers to LCHD and discuss proposed augmentations and implications related to expanding LCHD into pediatric nursing research.

Using Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Measure Brain Connectivity in Preterm Infants.

BACKGROUND: The use of functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) in research involving preterm infants is relatively new, and its feasibility in this population is not fully established. However, fcMRI images reveal functional neural connections that may be useful in establishing the mechanisms of neuroprotective interventions in preterm infants. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using fcMRI to measure differences in functional neural connections in nursing intervention studies. METHODS: A pilot study was conducted as part of a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the effect of a feeding intervention on neurodevelopmental and clinical outcomes of preterm infants randomly assigned to one of two groups: a patterned feeding experience (PFE) group and a usual feeding care (UFC) group. The fcMRIs were done at term-equivalent age. Visual, motor, and default mode networks were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven infants were studied (four were in the PFE group, and three were in the UFC group). Participants were selected sequentially from the parent RCT. Clear images were obtained from all participants. Differences were noted among PFE and UFC infants: Infants receiving PFE were hyperconnective in the default mode (caudate, anterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus) and motor networks (middle temporal and middle occipital areas) and hypoconnective in others areas of the default mode (hippocampal and lingual regions) and motor networks (precentral and superior frontal cortices) relative to UFC infants. No differences were noted in visual networks. DISCUSSION: The feasibility of using fcMRI at term-equivalent age in preterm infants who participated in an RCT on the effect of a nursing intervention was shown. Differences in connectivity among infants by group were detected. Further research is needed to show the benefit of fcMRI in studies of preterm infants given the costs of the procedure as well as the uncertain relationship of this early outcome measure to long-term neurodevelopment.